About the cover photo: It took me three attempts of between 4 and 5 days each to get into the spot where this photo was taken. On the first two trips I suffered some very painful injuries. This spot is in the Baker River drainage in North Cascades National Park. Do you know the name of the mountain?

Converse hightops on my feet, I traverse the North Cascades in pursuit of my life project to walk into every high lake or pond mapped in the Skagit River watershed. The upper Skagit Valley near Marblemount, WA is my home and has been home to my family since 1888. I have come to feel that the culture of this place, like the culture of much of rural America, is misunderstood by an increasingly urban population and threatened by economic depression. I would like to share the stories of this place and the people who call it home. Through my stories and images of these mountains, my goal is to help others understand and respect both the natural resources and the people of the North Cascades.


Saturday, October 25, 2014

Deer Season 2014, Weekend 2









There are some photos in this post showing dead animals and field dressing and butchering. Those sensitive to such things might not want to look at the photos. I tried to keep the gore to a minimum and it is not gratuitous.

Butchering day was the 16th this year, a Thursday. It was the same melancholy/happy day it usually is. This year Flopsy, the young bull, was butchered along with two heifers. All of these animals were good tempered and it was sad to see them go. As usual, I didn’t watch them get killed. At the same time, we procured our year’s worth of beef which felt really good. This experience is explained in more detail in my post, Butchering Day of 10/16 /13.

Now it was up to me to see if I could procure some venison for the year. I got out a few times during the week but didn’t see anything. I had been seeing lots of deer in valley but not many bucks. Some years a lot of deer and bucks especially hang out at higher elevations so decided to try a higher elevation area.

The spot I wanted to hunt was a place that I had been into in 2012 on my way into some ponds. I saw lots of deer sign in some older logging units and there were some new logging units since then. I had to walk about three miles in on abandoned roads to get to this spot.

This was a fairly long way in, though know of people who go much farther in to hunt. If I did get something, it would be too far to drag it out so I would have to pack it out. I decided to go in on Saturday so, if I got something, I would have an extra day to pack it out if needed. Even though I have hunted areas where I had to walk long distances in, I never got anything so I wasn’t very familiar with best way to pack an animal out, only what I had heard from other people who had done it. So, if I did get something, it would be a learning experience and probably wouldn’t be the smoothest operation I ever performed.

The weather Saturday was supposed to be showers and sunbreaks, good hunting weather, but when I got to my spot, it was all socked in with fog and I could only see a few yards. This was bad hunting weather. Many times in a pea soup fog like this I have heard deer run off before I even laid eyes on them because the fog was too thick. The wind was howling and the mist was swirling and eddying. I found a spot semi sheltered from the wind and waited half an hour to 45 minutes. The weather gradually transitioned from cloudy and rainy to rainy and sunbreaks.

Finally I was able to see several hundred yards which was perfect. It is best to approach an area you want to hunt from the downwind side so any deer there aren’t likely to smell, or wind, you. I have found that, in the mountains, this idea often works much better in theory than in practice because the wind swirls and changes direction so often that no matter how hard you try, you spend a lot of time upwind of an area. Sometimes I just ignore the wind direction and continue on in a way that is easier to travel and stay quiet and I have quite often had pretty good success with this method.

Saturday was one of those swirling winds days. I decided to take a route through the area that would cover the most ground where deer were likely to be. This would also be downwind of what the overall trend of the winds that day were but I would inevitably be upwind some of the time in the swirling wind.

Near the point I was going to leave the road and head down into the logging unit I saw three deer. None had antlers though I took some photos and, in looking at them later, I saw that the two smaller deer were tow-heads. So this looked like a doe and her twin buck fawns from this spring.

I continued on, easing down off the road and easing as quietly as I could through the logging unit. About a hundred yards into the unit I saw another deer. I spotted it's foreleg first. Deer are well camouflaged by the earth tones of their hair so one learns to look for shapes, mostly straight lines formed by their bodies, that aren’t usually formed by other objects. The back makes a straight horizontal line and the neck and legs make straight vertical lines. Sometimes you will spot the white throat patch, or, if you happen to look in just the right spot, the eyes or an ear or some other body part but the shape, more often than not, is how you spot an animal. I have employed the method of looking for shapes and forms to good effect while looking for other things like plants and mushrooms that don’t have colors that stand out.  

A quick look at its head told me it was a legal buck. I now had a choice. Most people, myself included, make better shots from a rest, a stump, a log, a hump of ground but there was nothing immediately at hand. There was a stump several feet in front of me but, quite often when you see a deer and stop and then start to walk again, they will spook and bound off and this deer was about two jumps from the timberline. I had stopped when I saw this deer and, as long as I stood there still, the deer probably wouldn’t spook immediately. But he knew I was there and probably wasn’t going to hang around very long either. 

So I needed to make a decision and make it quickly. I decided to make an offhand shot without a rest rather than trying to make it to the stump for a rest. I actually ended up in a kneeling position which is more stable than a completely offhand shot taken standing upright. I was on a sidehill though and it was still pretty awkward.

Then I misjudged the distance. I am a lousy judge of distance and I thought he was about two hundred yards away. I had sighted my rifle in for one hundred yards which would mean that, at two hundred yards, the bullet would hit low. So I aimed high to compensate and fired. The deer didn’t move. I knew that he wasn’t more than two hundred yards away so it had to be closer and I had shot high. I chambered another shell and, with an increased sense of urgency, adjusted my aim and fired again.

This time he went down hard but came back up again. I could tell I had made a solid hit but maybe not enough to keep him from running off where I couldn’t find him. Causing something to die a slow death was the worst possible outcome in my mind. I hate the thought of something suffering for a long time at my hands. Now I had to really fight to control a rising sense of panic. Panic only makes things worse, you hurry your shot too much and either miss or hit in a spot that doesn’t kill, causing the animal to suffer more and ruining meat. I chambered another shell, aimed and fired again. That shot did it. The deer was dead.

It wasn’t pretty but the job was done. It was over in less than 15 seconds and I don’t think the deer suffered too much. Not many animals die peacefully in their sleep in the wild, so this death at my hands probably involved a lot less suffering than under other circumstances. This didn’t make me feel any better though. I would have preferred a quicker kill with a single shot. I had a very similar experience with the deer I got last year. Obviously I need to practice more at my off hand shooting.

I approached the deer from behind, away from the legs. Even though it had quit moving, I wanted to make sure it was dead. Deer are amazingly strong and people have been badly injured or even killed when the deer they thought were dead suddenly got up and started kicking.

His eyes were open and glazed. He was definitely dead. My heart was heavy but this was mingled with a happy feeling. I had just killed a magnificent animal and this was a sad thing. At the same time, I admired his magnificence and I had just secured a whole bunch of food. The deer had paid the price for my existence on this earth. Someday something will kill me. Wouldn't it be ironic if I was killed by hitting a deer on the highway? I just hope I don’t have to suffer too much. I said a silent apology to the deer’s spirit for taking his life and thanked him for the food he would provide me and my family.

This deer appeared to be older. His muzzle was white and he had a notched ear. It looked like his antlers were beginning to regress, or get smaller and thicker with fewer tines on the main beams of antlers. This often happens during a deer’s declining years.

One of the surest ways to gauge a deer’s age is to look at the wear on its teeth. I am not familiar with this process but I know that in the past the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife set up data collection stations where hunters brought in their kills and data was collected for scientific studies and one of the steps in this data collection was aging the animals based on tooth wear. I also base some of my ideas about the age of this buck from information collected at these stations and passed on to me via people who had gotten a deer and gone to a data collection station.   

This deer’s neck was swollen in preparation for the rut and I could smell him when I got close, a rank, vaguely skunky smell. I heard my dad’s voice in my head, “Stupid kid, he’s too far in and he’s rutting”. Dad wasn’t a big fan of killing old rutting bucks, they smell bad and sometimes meat smells and tastes bad too and it is quite often tough. But this is the only time of year I have to hunt and it coincides with the start of the rut. As I stated in my previous post, I also prefer a younger more tender buck but I had to take what I could get legally, an older, rutting buck. The alternative was possible getting nothing.

The rut might actually be why I got this deer. He might have been after the doe I had just seen and didn’t want to abandon his pursuit. The urge to reproduce is a strong one and deer, even old cagey ones, get one track minds during the rut and act very stupidly quit often. I think this is one of the reasons Fish and Wildlife curtailed the late buck modern firearm season in some places. This season is during the height of the rut and deer are much easier to get because they are less wary and there was concern about over harvest in many areas.

The pause for reflection and a few photos over, it was down to work. There is an old saying that the work begins when you pull the trigger and this was very true for me this year. Last year I got my deer several hundred yards from my pickup, an easy drag. This year I earned the venison.

The first step was to get the carcass field dressed. Bacteria in the gut will rot a carcass from the inside out rather quickly, spoiling the meat. So it is important to get the guts out and get the carcass cooling off.

I saved the heart and liver for some friends who like it. Or I should say most of the liver. Part of it was damaged. The heart was interesting. It had some sort of bruise or what looked like bruise over one of the ventricles. Initially though I had grazed his heart but I hadn’t. The bruise looked older, like it was beginning to clot or resorb. Maybe this deer had heart disease. Or maybe the bruising was caused by the bullet that had damaged the liver. All I can say is that the bruise on the heart looked a little different than all the other deer hearts I have seen.

The next step was to skin the deer and cut it up into pieces that I could pack out. Before doing this, I retrieved my big pack that I had stashed about half a mile away. I had to do a lot of thinking while I was skinning the deer. I was trying to keep too much dirt from getting on the meat and hide. I was able to find the joints on the front legs and take them off without too much trouble and I used a small hatchet to cut through the breast bone, hind leg joints and pelvic bones.

While I was skinning, I noticed that there was another bruise on one hind leg that was beginning to heal. The blood of this bruise was beginning to turn yellow. This bruise was likely caused by a run-in with another buck.

Finally I had the hind quarters, or back half of the deer skinned. The deer was too big to pack out in a single trip so I decided to pack the hind quarters out first. This is the part of the deer that has the best meat so I wanted to make sure I got that out in case a bear or some coyotes came along while I was gone. I probably could have boned the carcass out and saved some weight but that would have taken more time. I thought that, if I hurried up, I could make two trips that day.

I got the hind quarters loaded in my big pack and started out. I left the front quarters and head along with my day pack and hatchet. I had also tagged the deer with my deer tag which was in my name. My hope was that, if anyone should happen to come across the carcass while I was gone, the presence of these things would indicate to them that I was coming back and that they would be honest enough to leave everything alone. Of course, wild animals couldn’t care less about any of the stuff I left behind. I did take my rifle out though.

All summer long I had packed loads of 65 or 70 pounds long distances and off trail so I was in pretty good shape but that pack with the hind quarters in it was, by far, the heaviest pack I had carried all year. It wasn’t to long before my shoulders were hurting and my legs were getting a little wobbly.

I had killed the deer at about 10:30 in the morning and got started out at about 1:00 in the afternoon. I didn’t get back to my pickup until about 2:30 in the afternoon. By this time my shoulders were aching and my legs were very wobbly. It would take an hour to get back to the deer, another hour or two to finish skinning and boning the carcass and at least several hours to get back, if I could even do it. I was already pretty tired and I didn’t know if I could do a repeat trip of what I had just done in the same day. If I did manage to pull it off, I would be getting home well after dark and Sacha would probably be very worried.  

I decided to chance it and leave the carcass overnight and come back for it in the morning. I felt pretty sure that it would still be there in the morning. I have seen many carcasses sit relatively untouched for several days. It seems like they really begin to attract scavengers after they start to decompose a bit and the smell gets stronger. Of course, I could be unlucky and have a bear or pack of coyotes wander through before I could get back and then the rest of the deer would be gone. I didn’t have any means to hang the carcass out of the reach of terrestrial scavengers or I could have done that before leaving. I would just have to chance it.

I got home with the hind quarters and washed them out and hung them and wrapped them in old sheets to keep the blowflies off. Then it was the long wait until morning. I didn’t sleep very well that night. As I said, I was pretty confident that the carcass would still be there in the morning but nothing is for sure.

I usually have a hard time getting out of bed in the morning but I didn’t that Sunday. I was up right at the alarm and had breakfast made and eaten and was out the door in less than an hour. I was walking up the abandoned road as soon as it was light enough to see, about half an hour or so before sunrise.

On the last quarter mile of road before I would head over the hill to the deer carcass I saw fresh tire tracks. This sparked a little panic in me but there was nothing I could do. Hopefully, if these folks saw the carcass they left it alone.

I started over the hill and hadn’t gone far before I heard the ravens. Then I saw several of them circling the area where the deer carcass lay. I was kind of hoping that they were going for the gut pile. There are a lot of highly nutritional organs in a gut pile and they are easier to get to than the meat on a carcass.

I finally reached a point where I could see that the deer carcass was still there. There were about half a dozen ravens in the area. They flew off as I approached and I saw that they had been working on the carcass. I had skinned out the front legs and they had gotten some meat off the ribs and one of the front legs. It wasn’t much though. I don’t mind sharing but next time I will take care to cover the carcass or not skin it out so much. They would have probably left it alone if they had had to peck through the hide.

Fortunately the ravens hadn’t drawn any large scavengers to the site. I bet this is a frequent occurrence and I hadn’t thought about it when I left the carcass. If I do more hunting like this in the future, I will have to take measures like covering and hanging whatever I have to leave behind for a second trip.  

I finished skinning the deer. I decided to take the front legs with the bone in, they detach quite easily from the rib cage, and bone out the ribs and neck. In the past I had thought that boning a carcass was rather wasteful but actually, what you leave behind when you do this is recycled on site through the scavengers that will finish off the carcass. If you take all of the carcass home and say, make soup, so you get almost every scrap of meat off the bone, most of the nutrients in that carcass that don’t go into your body will end up underground in a septic system or a sewage system and unavailable to be recycled. In a similar situation in the future, I may choose to bone everything out.

So I don’t think it is a terrible thing to leave a little behind to share with the other creatures in the area. It is important though, I believe, that you make an honest effort to make the most use you can of an animal you have killed. I don’t think it is right to kill something merely for a trophy and leave everything but the head behind.

My pack on Sunday was even heavier than on Saturday. Along with the front legs, backstraps, neck and rib meat, I also packed out the head and hide. I know people who will tan the hide and make good use of it so I thought it worthwhile to bring out. I also had to bring out my day pack and everything in it. The day pack wasn’t really heavy by itself but I was already overloaded.

I made it back without incident. My legs actually stood up to the pack quite well but my shoulders, back and bad hip were hurting. The work isn’t done yet though. We will cut up, package and freeze the meat on the coming weekend. See my Processing Venison post of 10/27/13 for an idea of that process. At some point we will be making sausage out of some of the venison which is even more work.  

Birch log covered with turkeytail fungus (Trametes versicolor). I saw this log while I was out hunting after work on a week day. Turkeytail fungus can be quite colorful. I also encountered some dyer's polypore (Phaeolus schweinitzii) looks somewhat similar to turkeytail fungus but grows on conifer logs later in the week but didn't take a photo. 

Shaggy manes (Coprinus comatus). Another find I made while hunting after work. These are edible and from, people I have talked to, quite delicious. I don't like mushrooms much. Sacha didn't want to try any because she had heard that some people have an adverse reaction to them. One of my references, "Mushrooms Demystified" by David Arora indicates that these may react with alcohol in the body causing a type of poisoning but makes no mention of problems when these are eaten without consuming alcohol. I see these mushrooms most often in the middle of gravel roads. 

Shaggy manes several days after emerging. Shaggy manes are in the same genus as inky caps (C. atramentarius) which can be used to make ink for writing when they begin to deteriorate or deliquesce. I appears most species in this genus deliquesce rather quickly after emerging. 

Mystery mushroom by the barn. This mushroom might only be a mystery to me. I am not familiar with it and didn't have time to get a spore print and identify it. Nonetheless, I thought it was pretty cool looking. 

Bleeding heart (Dicentra formosa) blooming in a newer logging unit.  This species ordinarily blooms in the spring but the temperature and photo period (length of daylight) evidently was similar enough to spring conditions to coax these plants into blooming. The disturbance of the logging may have also had something to do with it. In my previous post, I noted that many plants seem to put on new growth after a disturbance when they would ordinarily be storing reserves for winter. I wonder if the same thing happens in naturally occurring disturbances like burns and flood tracks. I will have to pay more attention to these areas in the future. It isn't just plants that respond to the similarity between autumn and spring photo period and temperature. There have been lots of red-legged frogs on the road after dark, just like in the springtime and I frequently hear tree frogs as well. 

These blossoms probably won't produce seed. In the spring, after pollination, the weather would trend warmer, allowing the seed to develop. At this time of year it will only get colder. 

Evergreen violet (Viola sempervirens).

Salal (Gaultheria shallon).

Disturbances also allow exotic plant species (weeds) to get established as well. This can occur whether the disturbance is human caused such as logging or construction or naturally occurring such as in burns and floodways. In this photo are three exotic species, oxeye daisy (Chrysanthemum leucanthemum), wall lettuce (Lactuca or Mycelis muralis) and Stinky Bob or Herb Robert (Geranium robertianum).

Foxglove (Digitalis purpurea), another exotic weedy, or not so weedy, depending upon one's point of view,  plant of disturbed areas. 

View from a spot I hunted after work one week day. 

Angel wings (Pleurotus porrigens) this edible relation to the oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) grows on rotting wood of coniferous trees. Oyster mushrooms tend to grow on hardwoods. 

The scene when I arrived at my hunting spot on Saturday morning. I could see barely ten feet through this. Though it may look calm, the wind was blowing and swirling hard enough to make my eyes water. The mist was swirling and eddying with the wind though it doesn't show it in this photo. 

After hunkering down for half an hour or 45 minutes, the fog began to lift and I continued on. 

I saw these three deer first. The one in the middle is a doe and the two on either side are tow-head bucks, probably this year's fawns. If one looks closely, (I don't know how much people's browsers will allow enlargement of the photos) you will see light patches on the heads of the two little deer, just inside the ears. 

Success! Unfortunately I didn't have time to take any photos of this guy while he was still alive. I took this photo after approaching from behind and cautiously circling around, keeping my distance until I was sure he was dead. 

This buck is what is called a 2x3 with eyeguards (two-point by three point with eyegurards) under the western count protocol for describing sets or racks of antlers. This means his rack has two points on one side and three on the other. The eyeguards are lower down, near the base of the antlers. I doubt that they actually guard the eyes and I don't know if they are that important for fighting from an evolutionary standpoint since many deer don't have them. The eyeguards count as a point in determining if the buck is legal to take in a given area. In other words a two point with eyeguards is legal to take in a three point minimum area. For this reason many people have taken to counting the eyeguards when describing the antlers, in other words, they would call this buck a 3x4. Under the eastern count protocol for describing antlers, this buck would be a seven-point. I like the original western count method because I think it gives the most accurate description of what the antlers look like. The variation and combination of points on racks is probably endless and I think this only adds to the beauty of these animals. This deer is older. The antlers are pretty thick or heavy and his muzzle from the nose to the forehead patch is solid white. 

Hind quarters packed and ready to go. I wrapped the meat in old cotton bedsheets. This allowed the meat to get air and cool off while limiting the amount of blood that got all over the pack. If I had put the meat in plastic bags, the bags would tend to trap the heat and increase the chance of spoilage. This is a different pack than the one I use for summer hiking. When just hiking, I usually only go armed with a hunting knife I don't want the attention a lot of blood would draw from predators and scavengers. I wasn't sure If I would be able to get back to get the other half of the deer that day so I chanced leaving it. The hind quarters have the most and best quality meat on the carcass so I figured if I was going to lose part of it, I wanted the better quality meat. I left my day pack behind and I had my tag on the deer carcass in the hopes that if anybody found it while I was gone, they would leave it alone because it would be obvious that I intended to come back. Of course, any wild animals that came across the carcass wouldn't care about the things I left.  

Sunday morning. The ravens got to the carcass while I was gone. I had hoped they would concentrate on the gut pile which would be easier pickings but several hit the carcass as well. I probably wouldn't have had this problem if I hadn't skinned it out so far, making it easy for the ravens to get to the meat under the tough hide. I could have also covered it better before I left. I was lucky the raven activity didn't draw larger scavengers to the site. I got a very early start because I was worried about just such an occurrence. The longer I left it lay, the greater the chance something big enough to carry the carcass off would come along. 

Close up of meat scavenged by ravens. I didn't lose too much meat. I took the front quarters home and put them in the freezer. I will thaw them out just before I cut them up. The scavenged area will be washed and the scavenged meat trimmed away. My main concern is of birds that went from the gut pile, which would have a lot of bacteria in it, to the carcass, spreading the bacteria to the carcass. The washing and trimming should take care of this issue. 

Front quarters, head and hide packed and ready to go. It looks like there is a lot of meat left on the remaining front part of the carcass but there is only a thin layer intimately wrapped around bone. This will be recycled into the soil of the area via scavengers and decay. The nutrients in the parts that I pack out will most likely end up in someone's body and underground in septic or sewage systems where they will be mostly unavailable for uptake by plants and other organisms for recycling into the system. So I don't feel too bad about leaving a little behind. I don't condone killing an animal for fun or merely for a trophy. 

It is best to have the antlers sticking down in an unnatural position if you decide to pack them, or the head, out.  I have heard of several instances where someone has almost been shot because somebody else can only see the antlers in their pack sticking up above a wall of brush or a log, giving the appearance of a live deer walking along behind whatever is obstructing the view. I couldn't get the antlers pointing down so I did the next best thing and hung my blaze orange vest over them and my pack. In most situations, anyone who saw the antlers would also see the blaze orange and hopefully be smart enough to realize that deer aren't blaze orange in color. 

The Twin Sisters on my way out. 

A tiny forest of Pacific silver fir (Abies amabilis), shorter than the forest of cone bearing stems of the running clubmoss (Lycopodium clavatum) that is growing between them. 

Glacier Peak and Whitechuck Mountain on the way out. There was a spectacular sunrise here on my way in but I had left my camera in my pack with the deer carcass. I probably wouldn't have stopped to take photos anyway because I was anxious to get back to the carcass. 

Vashti examining the deer head and hide. She had a lot of questions. "Why are his eyes closed?" Why is his tongue out?" "What does he say?" etc. The transport tag on the antlers has dates that can be notched for the day of harvest. It is illegal to transport or move a deer without a properly notched tag. Once the tag is notched, it can't be used again, helping to ensure people don't kill more deer than they are allowed in a year. In this case, I was allowed one. I will have to call in a hunter's report to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. In the report, they collect data on your hunting activity and the deer, if any, that you harvested. They ask where the deer was harvested and how many antler points on each side of the rack. This is a good way and probably fairly cheap way to collect a lot of data on deer populations. The check stands where the check the teeth to age animals and collect other observations about the deer carcasses get more precise data but are more expensive because people have to be paid to staff the check stands. 

I don't know if Vashti will grow up to be a hunter. It's okay if she doesn't. I do hope to help her understand how the world works though. There is no free lunch and no way to live without impacting other creatures. Organisms on this Earth interact with each other in intricate ways while living their lives. Many other organisms pay the price for our existence, even vegetarians have an impact. And we humans sometimes pay the price for some other organism's existence. At least from the standpoint of the resources we use and things we can control, the key is, to the best of our ability, strike a balance and respect and not over harvest any given resource.



Thursday, October 16, 2014

Deer Season 2014, Opening Weekend







Deer season for modern firearms opened on October 11th. I hunt deer with a modern firearm, a 30.06 (thirty aught six) to be precise. On a trivia note, the .30 caliber cartridge that this rifle fires was developed in 1906, hence the name “aught six”. I have covered my reasons for hunting in a previous blog post (Deer Season on 10/23/13).

Hunting with a modern firearm means I have three weekends, the last three in October, to get a deer. I do know of some places where I can hunt in November but they are relatively far away. I prefer to get my deer locally, it saves on gas and travel time. Having only three weekends to hunt sometimes makes it challenging to get a deer. I’ve seen quite a few this year and some were nice bucks but this was all before the season was open. If you don’t see them in season it doesn’t count.

Conditions looked good for the opening weekend of modern firearm deer season, overcast with rain. Rainy weather seems to be the best for getting deer out during daylight hours when it is legal to hunt. I don’t know exactly why this is. I have heard it speculated that, when it is clear and the moon is bright, most deer feed at night and hole up during the day. At any rate, overcast and rain or rain mixed with sunshine seems to be prime weather for seeing deer during daylight hours.

I didn’t stumble on to a legal deer right off the bat like I did last year. While that would have been nice because I have a long list of things that I need to take care of, it also means I got to poke around some more and do more exploring.

I did see deer, which is always encouraging. I saw a spike (one point) on Saturday and a doe and two tow-heads on Sunday. Tow-heads are young bucks, usually the spring of the year’s fawns that don’t have antlers yet. The spots on their heads that will grow antlers in the future are lighter colored, hence the name tow-head.

The spike was in a GMU, or game management unit, that requires a two point minimum for a deer to be legal. If he had been a few miles farther east, it would have been legal to take him because that GMU only requires any buck.

I know a lot of people who won’t shoot a spike or even a “Y” (two point). Though I love hunting for the sake of hunting, as far as I’m concerned, whether or not to take a deer, if it is legal to do so, is a calculation: $66 for a hunting license and deer tag, $30 for fuel for my pickup. We would have gotten 60-80 pounds of meat off that deer, so $1.23 to $1.65 per pound, not counting the time it would take to process the meat. That is a pretty decent price. If the season stretches out, that means more fuel and more of my time and the meat gets more expensive. I would not have taken the tow-heads if they had been legal because they were too small.

Added into the calculation, besides the price per pound for the meat, are all the projects I need to take care of, finishing the calf shed, winterizing things, finishing the clean up of the old house. And I would be able to spend more time with my family. 

Finally, yearling deer are much more tender and tastier than older deer that are rutting. It would have made practical and economical sense to take that spike if it had been legal to do so. All that being said, I am not kill crazy and it was nice to just watch the deer for a while. I might get a crack at him next year when he will be legal, that is, if he survives the bow hunting season, cougars, the highway and starvation this winter.

So, I poked around some more and, in the process, I learned a few things. I found Pacific silver fir (Abies amabilis) and Alaska yellow cedar (Chamaecyparis nootkatensis) at an elevation of about 370 feet. I also found Alaska cedar at another spot that was pretty low and rather isolated from other populations of Alaska cedar of which I aware. The funny thing about this last place is that I have hunted through this particular spot many times and walked past the Alaska cedars I don’t know how many times but this is the first time that I noticed them. 

I heard rock rabbits or pikas (Ochotona princips) at another low elevation site, well below the timber line at about 1600 feet elevation. I saw a lot of interesting things, mushrooms and stumps to name a few.

I also observed an interesting phenomenon. Deer with usually use most logging units heavily for a year or two after the logging. Then they apparently abandon many of these sites. When I say abandon, you still might see some passing through but they don’t linger. This year I went back to a site that was about six or seven years old and I figured would have most likely have been abandoned. To my surprise there was deer sign all over the place, much more than when the unit was new. It was almost like the site had “matured” as far as deer habitat is concerned.

I don’t know the reason for this but I did notice that the site was very rocky with poor soil. There was a lot of salal (Gaultheria shallon) which is an indicator of nitrogen poor soils. The replanted trees were eight to ten feet tall and seemed to be growing fine though there was a lot of space between them. There was some fireweed (Epilobium angustifolium) present but not tall, dense stands of it. There is an aster of some kind that I have noticed in the last ten years or so growing in dense stands in logging units after several years and this was absent.

It appears that the fireweed and aster are growing in so thickly that they outcompete other plants that deer use for browse. Deer browse young fireweed but I rarely see browsing on the large six foot or taller plants that grow in dense thickets. At this stage the fireweed is very stringy and probably not too palatable, kind of like string beans left too long before picking.

It seems to me that deer used logging units for longer periods of time back in the days when the slash was burned after logging. I know that fire can make a lot of nutrients available in many soils, enhancing plant growth. It might have also initially inhibited the growth of fireweed and other plants like the aster, giving browse plants a chance to get established where the current practice of spraying herbicide does not. Of course the frequent burning under the current timber harvest rotations of 50 years or less on private land, would probably create problems in addition to the air pollution which caused this practice to be stopped. All of this is pure speculation. There is no way to know without doing some scientific studies and probably such studies have been done.

I hunted on old homestead site, one of the remaining few of my youth that hasn’t had a modern house, or even a development put on it. It is always cool to hunt a place like this. I know it is purely my imagination but, at dusk this time of year, it seems like you can feel the spirits of yesteryear in the air. I have also had this experience hunting in different places throughout the mountains.

Probably the coolest experience of the weekend though was the still hunt I did Sunday afternoon. I have found a spot where deer travel through the general area in the afternoon or early evening. So I staked out a likely spot overlooking a deer trail and sat down and watched and listened and waited.

Sitting as still as you can and using all your senses to take in what is going on around you in the woods is a very cool experience. After a while you pick up a rhythm to the sounds, kind of like the normal sounds of human neighborhood in the city, except you are listening to several different species of birds and animals. In this case, I was close enough to the highway that the sound of traffic was also a background noise. At the point where you get the rhythm of the background sounds down, you can then pick out sounds that are a little different from the background.

Deer are very quiet but sometimes you can hear their light steps through heavy patches of leaves. Sometimes what you think is a deer is actually a Douglas squirrel (Tamiasciurus douglasii) or a bird like a rufous sided towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) that has a habit of making a lot of noise in the leaves.

This particular afternoon I heard Stellar’s jays (Cyanocitta stelleri) and squirrels scolding something in the distance. Quite often I am the one bearing the brunt of this type of scolding, the perennial frustration of hunters, because it alerts everything in the vicinity, including any deer, that you are there. This time I had settled in and remained still for long enough that the nearest squirrels had finally ignored me. The scolding I was hearing was farther away so I knew it wasn’t for me. It remained to be seen what it was though.

I heard the scolding progress nearer and nearer before it finally stopped. About five minutes later a little tow-head buck appeared as if by magic. As I said, deer are very quiet creatures and if they don’t have to go through anything particularly noisy, like dry leaves, they are pretty much silent. This one seemed to appear out of nowhere.

The deer was maybe thirty feet away from me when I first saw it. I was close enough to hear the crunch when the deer picked up and ate a leaf. It glanced briefly around, in the kind of nonchalant manner that often means there are more deer in the area and sure enough, a couple of seconds later, a saw his twin brother.

The first deer continued on, walking within ten feet of me. Deer are color blind, or so I have been told, but they are very sensitive to movement. So if you stay perfectly still, you are almost invisible to them. If you move or they smell you though the jig is up. I blew my cover by trying to get out camera to take picture. I was carrying my camera in a plastic bag to protect it from water and the rustle of a plastic bag is very out of place in the soundscape of woods.

The second little buck spooked and first one followed. They were out of sight in seconds. I remained in place for another half hour or so. Quite often another deer will come along on same path. I didn’t see anything else though. I heard something behind me not too far away, maybe 30 to 40 yards. It sounded like footsteps but wasn’t able to see anything.  

Deer season has its own feel. My legs and feet are quite often soaking wet after a day of hunting and they are usually aching too. I don’t hike nearly as far hunting as I do in the summer but the walking I am doing is very different and uses different muscle sets.

Imagine trying to walk around for most of the day on uneven ground, carefully placing your feet and trying to constantly maintain your balance when you feel stick after stick under your feet that you can’t put your full weight on because they will break and make a lot of noise if you do. In this case you have to keep your balance while shifting your weight off the stick foot and place the foot in a spot that won’t make noise.  

After the pleasant experience with the two little bucks, I came home to find out that, through the course of the day, Vashti had had her nap interrupted and poor Sacha spent the afternoon with two screaming children and was worn to a frazzle. At this point I don’t know what to say. Everybody in the house likes venison so it would seem that the time investment would be worthwhile but Sacha needs a break too. She has the hardest job in our household. I feel bad about not helping Sacha out more but there is a part of me that would be wild and grumpy, or worse, apathetic if I didn’t get to hunt.

Scene from one of the first areas I hunted this year. 

There is an image out there of logging units being scenes of total, unmitigated devastation but they also create openings for deer browse and things like wild blackberries (see Wild Blackberries and...). You can also see a lot of things from a dendrological standpoint. This tree, a Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) was wounded at some point in its history and grew back around the wound. The swirling areas below and to the left of the patch of rot in the center are formed by the layers of wood added each year as the tree grew around the wound. 

This tree grew back so completely that there is no evidence of a scar. Quite often the wound is a point where rot starts, leaving a permanent open scar in the tree bole. Even when a tree does grow back completely around the wound there is usually a very visible scar but there is none evident on this stump. A quick count of the annular rings on a nearby stump about this size indicated this tree was about 120 years old. It looked like a these were some trees left behind after a previous logging episode. 

An old Douglas-fir stump in the same unit as the stump above. There were quite a few stumps like this in the unit, indicating that the area had been logged before the current logging. Unfortunately I didn't include anything in this, or the previous photos for scale but this stump was about half to two thirds the diameter of the stump above. 

Douglas-fir stump from the recent logging episode. A quick count of the rings on this stump indicated that this tree was about 55-60 years old. Douglas-fir is a shade intolerant species so this tree most likely seeded in or was planted after the previous logging episode, giving us a rough date of that logging episode. So the evidence on the ground indicates that a stand of timber about 60 years old was logged in a thinning or partial cut about 60 years ago. The trees that were about 120 years old at the time of the present logging episode were about 60 years old 60 years ago. 

Partially knurled Douglas-fir stump. Knurling is the result of root grafts or mycorrhizal fungi connections between neighboring trees. When a tree is cut, the tissue in the stump keeps getting resources from its neighbor and/or the mycorrhiza and continues to grow. This stump was in another logging unit where there was a partial cut. This tree was cut but its neighbors were left behind. You can get a rough date of the partial cut from this stump. It was a while ago, ten years or more probably because the stump is weathered and beginning to decay. But you can tell this tree was cut since about the 1960's because the cut used to fell it is called a Humboldt cut or face where the undercut is taken out of the stump rather than the bole of the tree. This type of cut has been regularly employed in this area since about the mid-1960's. This was probably more recent though because smaller stumps like this one and others nearby, which are a little less than 2 feet in diameter usually decay to the point of losing their form within a couple of decades.  

Another stump completely knurled over in another logging unit. This stump, in the background, was at the edge of an old grade and the tree was cut during the initial logging event. The stump in the foreground was probably left during the initial logging event. It was cut with a machine called a feller-buncher or something similar during the most recent logging event. Feller-bunchers cut the tree straight across the trunk, leaving a flat stump with no undercut and no hinge, the line of wood left near the middle of the stump in a hand cut stump. Because the saw employed by a feller-buncher has much larger, coarser teeth than a hand held saw, they also tend to leave frayed or splintered edges on the stump. 

Another view of the stump above. Most of the places where I have seen knurling are rockier with poorer soils. Evidently, there is more root grafting occurring or mychorrhizal fungi present in soils of this type. 

Heavily browsed thimbleberry (Rubus parviflorus) in a new logging unit. I have heard that the browse in logging units is less nutritious but deer and elk flock to them for the browse. Either the information I got is not true or the browse is just so abundant that it makes up for the lower nutritive value. I have noticed that the majority of the browse is on young plants or shoots just growing back after being damaged or getting an opportunity to grow because there is more light. Young shoots and plants are probably much more palatable and even nutritious because there are a lot of resources for growth present in the new leaves and buds. In this instance, the new growth is occurring at a time of year when most plants are beginning to senesce and send all of their resources from the leaves back to their roots, stems or buds. 

Large thimbleberry. Older, larger plants like these are beginning to channel the nutrients from the leaves back into the roots, stems and buds for the winter. You don't see much browse on plants like these. The senescent leaves probably have few nutrients and lots of fiber that is hard to chew and digest. The buds left behind for the winter are high in nutrients and often get browsed but they are only a fraction of the size of an entire leaf. It seems to me that deer quit using a logged area after a few years when the vegetation becomes dominated by larger plants like these.   

An unmapped wetland I stumbled across while poking around hunting. This is a spot that I wouldn't have visited ordinarily. 

Cracked-Cap bolete (Boletus chrysenteron) with a parasitic fungus. In one of my references, Mushrooms Demystified, by David Arora, the author states that cracked cap boletes are "prone to attack by a powdery white to bright yellow parasitic fungus (Hypomyces chrysospermum) which eventually engulfs the entire fruiting body, making it look like a very sick puffball."

Fly agaric or fly amanita (Amanita muscaria). These are pretty but poisonous. I the toxins in this mushroom are hallucinogenic and concentrations vary from mushroom to mushroom. Human reaction to eating this mushroom varies as well I understand. In some cases I have heard it can cause erratic, violent behavior. Some believe the Viking berserkers ate these mushrooms before going into battle. It might be possible to eat enough of these mushrooms to receive a fatal dose of the toxins. I wouldn't try eating any. They are quite striking to look at though. 

Red alder (Alnus rubra) snag populated with oster mushrooms (Pleurotus ostreatus). These are edible. I have noticed that they seem most likely to populate wood that is not in contact with the ground, either snags or logs are suspended above the ground. If the log is in contact with the ground some other species like turkeytail fungus (Trametes versicolor) seem to populate the log though occasionally I do see oyster mushrooms on downed logs. 

Alder snag populated with clustered woodlover or sulfur tuft (Hypholoma fasciculare or Naematoloma fasciculare) and scaly pholiota (Pholiota squarrosa) neither of which is edible. I ran across this snag and the one above in a place I wouldn't have ordinarily gone if I had not been hunting. 

Bear scat. While this isn't particularly appealing, it does tell us that this bear has been eating apples, probably in an abandoned orchard nearby to get ready for winter. 

Old homestead. This is what remains of what was a field of about five acres when I was a kid. The forest is steadily encroaching. The house sat just out of the frame to the right. It was finally torn down and burned because it kept getting vandalized and the owners didn't want the liability if someone got hurt in it. As I said in the text, I like going through places like this right at dusk this time of year. It is my imagination but it feels like you can feel the spirits of yesteryear in the air. 

Vinca (Vinca minor), the scourge of home sites old and new. This stuff grows well in the shade, crowds out native plants and is hard to kill. It was growing at the old home site. 

The spike or one point I saw. This guy was probably run off by his mother just this summer. There weren't any other deer in the area. Quite often you will see young spikes or "Y's" or does of this age by themselves or with a companion of about the same age. 

Western toad (Bufo boreas) I came across while hunting, again in an area where I wouldn't have gone otherwise if I hadn't been hunting. This toad appeared to be melanistic or darker than usual. I saw one with similar coloration only a few weeks ago. This coloration change might be seasonal. I doubt this but I don't know for sure.